.jpg)
In this post, you will witness a comparison of two pricey flagships. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra compares. the iPhone 13 Pro. This article will assist you in choosing between these gadgets. A small spoiler before you read the entire article. Apple continues to fall behind. Xiaomi makes use of as much innovative technologies as possible. Let us now go to the article itself.
iPhone 13 Pro versus Xiaomi 12S Ultra
In general, none has overwhelming supremacy over the other. Both gadgets are really strong and functional, and they have a premium feel about them. The iPhone 13 Pro runs iOS, whilst the Xiaomi 12S Ultra runs the Android-based MIUI interface. It's worth noting that the iOS UI is quite smooth. However, if you want to install APKs on your device, root it, and so on, you should go for the Xiaomi 12S Ultra. Such things are not impossible on iOS systems, but they need jailbreaking, and jailbreaking on iOS devices is often a very late process.
To summarise, iOS is one step ahead in terms of interface smoothness and reliability, but if you are not an end user, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra might be a better choice.
Screen comparison: Xiaomi 12S Ultra vs. iPhone 13 Pro
.jpg)
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra boasts a 120Hz QHD+ (1440X3200) AMOLED screen. The screen is 6.73′′ in size. This screen offers HDR10+, Dolby Vision, an 8,000,000:1 contrast ratio, 10bit colour depth, 522 PPI, 240Hz touch responsiveness, and a maximum brightness of 1500 nits. The screen of the Xiaomi 12S Ultra appears to be rather large. This screen, which is covered by Gorilla Glass Victus, has an 89% screen-to-device ratio.
The screen of the iPhone 13 Pro is FHD+(11702532) 120Hz Super Retina XDR OLED. This screen has 460 PPI, which is lower than that of the Xiaomi 12S Ultra. In addition, the iPhone 13 Pro offers True Tone, a contrast ratio of 2.000.000:1, and a maximum screen brightness of 1200 nits. On the iPhone 13 Pro, the screen-to-body ratio is 85%, thanks to Corning Ceramic Shield Glass.
To be honest, the screen of the Xiaomi 12S Ultra is significantly superior, even without the Super Retina XDR display and ceramic protection, with greater pixel density, higher resolution, always-on display (which Apple still doesn't know about), better contrast ratio, and a better screen-to-body ratio. In terms of display, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra is superior.
Battery comparison: Xiaomi 12S Ultra vs. iPhone 13 Pro
.jpg)
In reality, there is no need to compare it because everyone is aware of how much Apple lags in terms of battery/charging. But let's have a peek nonetheless. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a 4860mAh battery. The wired charging speed of this battery is 67W. Wirelessly, 50W. These speeds are enough for today. It just takes 43 minutes to charge the Xiaomi 12S Ultra from 0 to 100 using 67W. Furthermore, the +4500 mAh battery eliminates the need to charge your cellphone during normal use throughout the day.
On the iPhone, the situation is slightly different; practically all businesses provide +50W charging speeds, however Apple continues to employ sluggish charging on its smartphones. Although more than 10W is considered rapid charging, 27W (peak) is a rather slow charging speed when compared to competition. The iPhone 13 Pro's battery capacity is 3095 mAh. With cable charging, the 3095 mAh battery is completely charged from 0-100 in 1 hour and 51 minutes at a maximum charging speed of 27W. The wireless charging speed is 7.5W, which is very amusing in this day and age. However, with MagSafe, it can reach 15W.
Apple has lately improved the battery, but not sufficiently. In usual use, the iPhone 13 Pro may most likely be used without charging for one day. However, the charging pace is rather slow; if speed is crucial, no one would choose a gadget that charges in 2 hours rather than 43 minutes. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra appears to have made a significant improvement in this aspect.
Camera comparison: Xiaomi 12S Ultra vs. iPhone 13 Pro
.jpg)
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra boasts a quad camera setup on the back. 50 megapixel main camera, 48 megapixel wide angle camera, and 48 megapixel telephoto camera It also features a 0.3 megapixel ToF 3D sensor. It also supports video recording at up to 8k 24 FPS. It's also worth noting that the Xiaomi 12S Ultra includes a high-quality Leica lens and camera software. The front camera is a conventional 32 megapixel camera in the shape of a hole in the screen.
The iPhone 13 Pro sports a quad rear camera setup as well. The primary camera, telephoto camera, wide angle camera, and ToF sensor are all present. All of the cameras have 12mpx resolution. Although megapixel does not have a significant impact on photo quality, 12 megapixels is considered ancient. You should be aware that Apple outperforms all other businesses in video; nonetheless, video recording possibilities are restricted to a maximum of 4k 60 FPS. It's not a huge deal. You make the camera selection. Also, please specify in the comments.
Performance comparison: Xiaomi 12S Ultra vs. iPhone 13 Pro
.jpg)
TSMC's Snapdragon 8+Gen1 flagship processor powers the Xiaomi 12S Ultra. This CPU, manufactured using 4nm technology, operates at 3.2 GHz. The GPU is Qualcomm Adreno 730, with a frequency of 730 MHz. Antutu v9 gives this Xiaomi performance beast 1,105,958 points. It also makes use of UFS3.1 storage. And it employs LPDDR5 RAM.
Apple use the A15 Bionic chipset. This CPU has six cores. So it's referred to as hexa-core. Of course, today's top handsets are powered by octa-core (8 core) CPUs. This CPU, manufactured using a 5nm technology, operates at 3.1 GHz. It also makes use of Apple's 5-core GPU as a GPU. They used LPDDR5 in RAMs to catch the age. Antutu v9 has a score of just 839,675. With fewer cores and a lower overall frequency, it can't be expected to outperform the Xiaomi 12S Ultra. In terms of performance, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra comes out on top.
This is the overall comparison; in my view as an Android fan, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra is superior. However, you must select based on your own criteria. Let me know which gadget you prefer in the comments. You may also read the overall VS between Xiaomi and Apple.
